Forgejo-patched claude-code-gitea-action (View-job URL uses per-repo run index)
Some checks failed
Test Custom Executables / test-custom-executables (push) Has been cancelled
CI / test (push) Has been cancelled
CI / prettier (push) Has been cancelled
CI / typecheck (push) Has been cancelled
Sync Base Action to claude-code-base-action / Sync base-action to claude-code-base-action repository (push) Has been cancelled
Test Claude Code Action / test-inline-prompt (push) Has been cancelled
Test Claude Code Action / test-prompt-file (push) Has been cancelled
Test Claude Env Feature / test-claude-env-with-comments (push) Has been cancelled
Test MCP Servers / test-mcp-integration (push) Has been cancelled
Test MCP Servers / test-mcp-config-flag (push) Has been cancelled
Test Settings Feature / test-settings-inline-allow (push) Has been cancelled
Test Settings Feature / test-settings-inline-deny (push) Has been cancelled
Test Settings Feature / test-settings-file-allow (push) Has been cancelled
Test Settings Feature / test-settings-file-deny (push) Has been cancelled

Fork of markwylde/claude-code-gitea-action@b744372 (v1.0.21) with the
'View job' link fixed to use GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER (per-repo index) instead of
GITHUB_RUN_ID (global id), because Forgejo routes run pages by per-repo index.
See VENDOR.txt.
This commit is contained in:
claude (ops) 2026-07-01 06:42:55 +00:00
commit 32685a740f
151 changed files with 23555 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
name: Claude Review - Path Specific
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
paths:
# Only run when specific paths are modified
- "src/**/*.js"
- "src/**/*.ts"
- "api/**/*.py"
# You can add more specific patterns as needed
jobs:
claude-review-paths:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: read
id-token: write
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 1
- name: Claude Code Review
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@beta
with:
anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
timeout_minutes: "60"
direct_prompt: |
Please review this pull request focusing on the changed files.
Provide feedback on:
- Code quality and adherence to best practices
- Potential bugs or edge cases
- Performance considerations
- Security implications
- Suggestions for improvement
Since this PR touches critical source code paths, please be thorough
in your review and provide inline comments where appropriate.